The UK Government has introduced significant changes to reporting obligations for “Relevant firms” via the Sanctions (EU Exit) (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No 2) Regulations 2024 (“Amending Regulations”). These changes affect all UK sanctions regimes, including the Russia sanctions regime.
The key changes are:
- Broadened Definition of “Relevant firms” (that is, those subject to reporting obligations) – High-value dealers, art market participants, insolvency practitioners, and letting agents are now included. (Effective from 14 May 2025.)
- Lowered Reporting Threshold – Firms must report suspected breaches more broadly, even if they do not amount to criminal offences. (Effective now.)
In this article, we break down what these updates mean.
Broadened definition of “Relevant firms”
“Relevant firms” are listed in the UK’s regulations that govern the specific sanctions regimes, e.g. The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (“Russia Regulations”) in relation to the Russian Regime.
The types of business captured under “Relevant firms” are generally identical across the sanctions regimes, and include law firms, accounting firms, casino operators, cryptocurrency providers.
Under the Amending Regulations, the definition of “Relevant firms” will also include:
- high-value dealers – a firm/sole trader that trades in goods (including an auctioneer), where a transaction involves cash payment or payments exceeding 10,000 euros in total.
- art market participants – a firm/sole practitioner registered or required to register with HMRC as an art market participant. This excludes firms/sole practitioners that sell or store art works created by the participants themselves.
- insolvency practitioners – a firm/individual who acts as an insolvency practitioner as defined in the Insolvency Act 1986.
- letting agents – firms/sole practitioners conducting work related to instructions from landlords or tenants seeking to rent land for a term of a month or more, including actions leading to the conclusion of rental agreements.
Why the change?
The Explanatory Memorandum to the Amending Regulations notes that the inclusion of the four new sectors as ‘Relevant firms’ is to improve their compliance with the UK’s sanctions law, as businesses in these sectors “can be utilised” (and, the EM says, have been utilised) by designated persons and have not proactively reported breaches of financial sanctions to OFSI.
OFSI notes, in its guidance for high value dealers and art market participants, that the inclusion of the two sectors as ‘Relevant firms’ is influenced by sectors’ susceptibility to being used to evade the UK’s financial sanctions, and to launder the proceeds of criminal activities. This includes the discreet nature of sales/purchases in these sectors allowing designated persons and/or entities to sell assets, launder money and transfer goods.
We note that this change only takes effect from 14 May 2025, giving businesses time to adjust their compliance processes.
Lower threshold for reporting to OFSI
Previously, ‘Relevant firms’ were required to inform OFSI as soon as practicable if they knew or had reasonable cause to suspect:
- a person was a DP; or
- a person had “committed an offence” under UK sanctions law.
The Amending Regulations have shifted the second requirement.
Now, “Relevant firms” are required to inform OFSI as soon as practicable if they know or have reasonable cause to suspect a person “breached a prohibition or failed to comply with an obligation” under UK sanctions law.
Why the change?
This change is intended to simplify compliance. A “Relevant firm” does not need to consider whether a person’s conduct may amount to a criminal offence (for instance, if the person had a reasonable excuse for not complying with an obligation). Instead, the “Relevant firm” must simply consider whether they know or have reasonable cause to suspect the conduct was contrary to a prohibition or requirement under the relevant sanctions’ legislation.
We note that relevant firms are only required to report the information or other matter on which the knowledge or cause for suspicion is based came to it in the course of carrying on its business. For example, in relation to a ‘high value dealer’, this means in the course of carrying on the activity mentioned in the definition of high value dealer.
Key takeaway
Failure to comply with reporting obligations is an offence attracting criminal and monetary penalties. So, businesses should:
- Assess whether they fall under the expanded definition of “Relevant firms.”
- Update compliance procedures to meet the lowered reporting threshold.
With the 14 May 2025 deadline approaching for the expanded definition, and the lower reporting threshold in force already, timely preparation is essential to avoid breaches of UK sanctions law.
More like this
Sanctions compliance – John Binns speaks to The Law Society Gazette
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has thrust sanctions compliance up the agenda for law firms of all sizes. BCL’s John Binns spoke to Katharine Freeland
”UK sanctions—a year in review” John Binns writes for LexisNexis
To say that this has been a game-changing year in UK sanctions would be an understatement. Almost a year since the start of the conflict in Ukraine
Chambers and Partners Sanctions 2024 Guide
The new Chambers and Partners UK Chapter of the Sanctions 2024 Guide, written by Partner John Binns, covers key jurisdictions, providing the latest information on regulatory and legal updates, delisting challenges, trade and export restrictions, litigation and arbitration and designation, compliance and circumvention.
Russia Sanctions and Legal Advice: Some Much-Needed Clarity
The UK Government has introduced key changes to the sanctions provisions regarding legal advisory services in the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (“Russia Regulations”).
The UK has sanctioned 7 Israeli settler outposts and organisations in the West Bank
On 15 October 2024, the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (“FCDO”) sanctioned three settler outposts and four Israeli organisations that it says “have supported and sponsored violence against communities in the West Bank”, under the UK’s global human rights sanctions regime.
Secondary Sanctions, De-Risking, and More: How UK Sanctions Aim for Global Reach
On 26 June 2025, the FCDO published new guidance on UK sanctions compliance for non-UK companies, including businesses in Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan.
UK Sanctions Round-Up: Enforcement Tightens
BCL’s latest sanctions round-up highlights key UK and international developments in sanctions law, enforcement, and policy.
Sanctions Fortnightly Summary: Key UK and Global Developments
This edition of our sanctions round-up covers key UK and international developments.
Fortnightly Sanctions Summary: New Licences, Designations and Enforcement
BCL’s latest sanctions and export controls round-up reviews significant developments in UK and international sanctions law and enforcement over the past fortnight.
Sanctions Round-Up: OFSI Annual Review, Russian Designations, and Policy Shifts
Our latest Sanctions and Export Controls Fortnightly Round-Up reviews key UK and international developments from 6th to 17th October 2025.
Global Sanctions Tighten: New OFSI Licences, EU’s 19th Russia Package, and Lifting of UK Arms Embargo on Armenia and Azerbaijan
This edition covers key UK, US, and EU sanctions and export control developments over the past two weeks.
Fortnightly Sanctions Round-Up: Lukoil Licences, Cyber Designations & Parliamentary Updates
This fortnight’s update highlights significant UK and international developments in sanctions and export controls, including new OFSI General Licences connected to Lukoil, fresh designations under the UK’s Russia and Cyber regimes, and parliamentary scrutiny concerning the use of interest accrued on the frozen proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club.
Sanctions & Export Controls Round-Up: December Update
BCL’s latest sanctions and export controls round-up highlights key UK and international developments in sanctions law and compliance.
BCL Sanctions Round-Up: Key UK and Global Developments
This first 2026 edition considers evolving UK sanctions enforcement practice, government policy responses to sanctions evasion, and Parliamentary scrutiny of the UK’s Magnitsky-style regimes. It also examines developments relating to Venezuela, shadow fleet activity, crypto-assets and humanitarian licensing.
John Binns Comments on OFSI’s Sanctions Enforcement Overhaul
John Binns, Partner at BCL, has commented on major reforms announced by the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), including new settlement incentives that could reshape enforcement strategy.
UK and International Sanctions: Key Developments – February 2026
This edition highlights key developments in UK and international sanctions and export controls, including enforcement reforms, new designations, and emerging compliance risks.
UK Tightens Sanctions on Russia: BCLs John Binns Warns of Rising Business Impacts
ImpactsThe UK has unveiled nearly 300 new sanctions against Russia, its largest package since the early months of the Ukraine war, targeting oil exports, financial services, military supply chains and energy sectors.
BCL Sanctions Update: Key UK Enforcement, Policy and Compliance Trends
This update highlights major UK and international sanctions developments, with a particular focus on the UK’s expanded Russia sanctions regime, evolving designation strategies, and key enforcement, policy and compliance considerations for businesses.